By Alex Brown, Stateline.org (TNS)
For years, outdoor fanatics in New Mexico have pushed to overtake the state Division of Recreation & Fish — an company affected by management turnover, funding woes and the scorn of hunters and tree-huggers alike.
Now, state lawmakers have given the company a brand new identify, a brand new mission, new management and a lift in funding to develop its position. The sweeping regulation enacted in March places New Mexico on the forefront of a rising motion to rethink states’ conventional mannequin of wildlife administration.
“We got here from a spot of utmost dysfunction,” mentioned Jesse Deubel, government director of the New Mexico Wildlife Federation, an environmental nonprofit that advocated for the brand new regulation. “Now, I actually do imagine that we’re going to be a gold commonplace for wildlife administration. Over the following few years. you’re going to see an unbelievable shift.”
New Mexico’s new strategy expands the company’s focus past looking and fishing to guard extra species and brings in new funding to cut back its reliance on license gross sales. Different states are watching carefully. Lawmakers throughout the nation have launched payments to vary their wildlife businesses, and lots of have cited the New Mexico measure for example of what’s potential.
“That’s the largest sport changer,” mentioned Michelle Lute, government director of Wildlife for All, a nationwide nonprofit targeted on overhauling states’ wildlife governance. “That’s the laws we’ll be pointing to as a mannequin in future years.”
From Oregon to Utah to Florida, legislators have launched payments that will overhaul their wildlife businesses’ funding, mission and governance.
Whereas the proposals have had various ranges of success, New Mexico leaders say it took years of coalition-building to get their invoice throughout the end line. Wildlife advocates count on the problem to earn extra legislative consideration nationwide within the years to return.
Underneath the normal mannequin, state wildlife businesses have largely been funded by the license charges paid by hunters and anglers, plus federal excise taxes on gear equivalent to weapons and fishing sort out. The businesses have targeted most of their work on species like deer and trout, prized by the sporting teams that present their income.
In New Mexico, as in most states, the commissions that govern these departments have been appointed by governors. They’re typically stuffed by looking and fishing guides, ranchers and political donors. Critics say this mannequin ends in panels that set coverage to guard their financial pursuits.
Right this moment, many wildlife businesses are struggling to remain afloat as fewer and fewer residents hunt and fish. On the identical time, plummeting wildlife populations are compelling businesses to develop their work past conventional “sport” species. And a few wildlife advocates are demanding a brand new governance mannequin that places extra scientists in cost.
This yr, state lawmakers throughout the nation have handed or thought-about a number of main wildlife administration overhauls. Some would develop their businesses’ mission to give attention to non-game species. Others would offer new funding streams to tackle that extra work. And a few would change the make-up of the commissions that dictate wildlife coverage.
In New Mexico, lawmakers did all three directly.
The state’s company had confronted quite a few issues over time. Hunters and bird-watchers alike had been pissed off with the company’s management. Lately, a number of commissioners have resigned or been compelled out by Democratic Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham. At instances, the panel has lacked sufficient members to kind a quorum.
The company’s funds was in hassle as properly. The state had not raised license charges in practically 20 years, retaining income flat whilst inflation made the price of its work increasingly costly.
“We had been having to repurpose cash from on-the-ground conservation simply to make wage changes,” mentioned Stewart Liley, wildlife division chief with the New Mexico Division of Recreation & Fish. “We had been attending to a precarious spot.”
In 2023, lawmakers handed a invoice to restructure the company’s fee, which might have taken some energy away from the governor. Lujan Grisham declined to signal the invoice, killing the trouble with a pocket veto.
This yr, lawmakers took an even bigger swing. The bundle handed this session renames the Division of Recreation & Fish to the Division of Wildlife. It expands the company’s authority to guard non-game species in want of conservation assist.
“We needed to make it clear that that is our state wildlife company, and it’s the one one we’ve bought,” mentioned Deubel, of the New Mexico Wildlife Federation. “They’ve bought a accountability to work on any species within the state that has conservation want.”
Company leaders say they had been already conducting analysis and conservation work for non-game species. They considered that side of the invoice as a largely symbolic measure that “shined a lightweight” on the necessity for extra restoration work, Liley mentioned. Nevertheless, the regulation did present extra specific authority for the company to handle bugs and regulate the direct “take,” or killing, of sure animals.
The measure raises license charges — a provision supported by many looking and fishing teams — and permits for inflation-based changes in future years. In the meantime, lawmakers included one other $10.5 million from the state funds, unfold over three years, to assist the company tackle extra non-game conservation.
“It appeared solely truthful that if we had been going to ask the division to tackle a broader position that they not finance that simply by looking and fishing,” mentioned Democratic state Rep. Matthew McQueen, who was among the many key sponsors.
Liley, the company official, mentioned the brand new cash, together with a separate conservation fund established in 2023, will greater than double the state’s funding in serving to threatened species. The company expects to rent as much as eight new biologists who will conduct analysis, decide which species want assist and lead restoration efforts.
“This can assist us get a greater grasp of the place we’re with completely different species throughout the state,” he mentioned. “There are completely initiatives we now have not undertaken due to lack of capability. This can enable us to do extra surveys, to radio-mark birds, to [use that research] and say, ‘Let’s do forest restoration this fashion for pinyon jays.’”
The bundle will even change the company’s governance. The present fee has seven seats, all appointed by the governor. Lujan Grisham’s appointees have included a automobile supplier, an Exxon Mobil lobbyist and a former lawmaker who owns an oil and gasoline enterprise.
Underneath the brand new mannequin, a bipartisan legislative committee will nominate three candidates for each seat, every of whom have to be vetted to reveal their information of wildlife. The governor should select from amongst these three. One of many seats might be reserved for a wildlife scientist, one for a conservationist, one for a hunter and angler and one for a rancher or farmer.
“These modifications add experience and actually necessary views to the fee,” mentioned Chris Smith, wildlife program director with WildEarth Guardians, an environmental nonprofit. “Our [current] fee was having structural issues and lightweight scandal virtually constantly.”
Backers’ one disappointment is that Lujan Grisham used a partial veto to strike a provision that will have protected fee members from dismissal by the governor. She argued that the proposed change relied too closely on the slow-moving courtroom system to take away commissioners, making it tough to carry problematic members accountable.
Lawmakers say they’re nonetheless intent on defending company leaders from the governor’s whims, however happy the remainder of the bundle has gone into impact. Whereas the measure handed with bipartisan majorities, some lawmakers objected to the concept of increasing the company’s mission to guard species past these that may be hunted.
“With all due respect, I don’t need to pay for a butterfly,” mentioned Republican state Rep. Harlan Vincent, based on KUNM. “I’m simply being sincere with you.”
And a few teams are skeptical that the additional funding from the state funds might be sufficient to cowl the company’s rising conservation position.
“If New Mexico needs to develop the mission of the division, New Mexico must pay for it,” Tom Paterson, president-elect of the New Mexico Cattle Growers’ Affiliation, mentioned throughout a Senate committee listening to. “The mandatory funds mustn’t come on the again of the license charges that hunters and anglers pay.”
Whereas the company’s new funding and mission are actually in place, its identify change to the Division of Wildlife received’t take impact till subsequent yr. And its present fee will stay in workplace till Jan. 1, 2027. Lujan Grisham’s successor will then appoint new commissioners underneath the revised mannequin.
The advocates who backed the New Mexico overhaul say it would take time and funding to make the brand new mannequin work. They know different states might be watching carefully.
Stateline reporter Alex Brown might be reached at abrown@stateline.org.
©2025 States Newsroom. Go to at stateline.org. Distributed by Tribune Content material Company, LLC.